0
오늘 하루동안 보지 않기
잠시만 기다려 주세요. 로딩중입니다.
KMID : 0360220180590040325
대한안과학회지
2018년 59권 4호 p.325 ~ p.331
회절 이중초점 인공수정체와 회절 삼중초점 인공수정체의 임상 결과 비교
Clinical Outcomes of Patients Fitted with Bifocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses
서정기 ( Seo Jeong-Gi ) - 연세대학교 의과대학 안과학교실

최문정 ( Choi Moon-Jung ) - 연세대학교 의과대학 안과학교실
서경률 ( Seo Kyoung-Yul ) - 연세대학교 의과대학 안과학교실
김응권 ( Kim Eung-Kweon ) - 연세대학교 의과대학 안과학교실
김태임 ( Kim Tae-Im ) - 연세대학교 의과대학 안과학교실
- Abstract -
Purpose: We compared the short-term visual outcomes of patients fitted with trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses (IOLs) and bifocal IOLs 3 months after IOL implantation.

Methods: We included 38 eyes undergoing IOL implantation at a single tertiary hospital. In all, 21 eyes received bifocal IOLs (TECNIS® 1 ZLB00; Abbott Medical Optics Inc., Santa Ana, CA, USA) and 17 received trifocal diffractive IOLs (FineVision® POD F; PhysIOL SA, Liege, Belgium). The primary outcomes were corrected and uncorrected visual acuities at 4 m, 50 cm, and 33 cm on postoperative weeks 1, 4, and 12, and the spherical equivalence values at those times. The secondary outcomes included contrast sensitivity measured using an Optec 6500® instrument (Stereo Optical Co. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) 4 weeks after surgery, the numbers of total and internal optical aberrations assessed using the iTrace® (Tracey Technologies, Houston, TX, USA) instrument at 12 weeks, symptoms including glare or halo, and the need for spectacles when engaging in daily activity.

Results: One week after surgery, eyes implanted with trifocal IOLs exhibited significantly better uncorrected near vision compared to eyes that had received bifocal IOLs, and at weeks 4 and 12, uncorrected intermediate vision was also better in the former eyes. The mean spherical equivalence did not significantly differ between the two groups, nor did the contrast sensitivity measured on postoperative week 4 or the numbers of optical aberrations evident at postoperative week 12. Eyes fitted with trifocal IOLs appeared to suffer less from glare or halo, but the between-group difference was not significant. The two groups did not significantly differ in terms of the need to wear supplementary spectacles.

Conclusions: Trifocal diffractive IOLs seem to afford superior intermediate vision compared to traditional bifocal IOLs, and may therefore improve visual outcomes at varying distances in patients undergoing cataract surgery.
- Key Words -

Cataract, Diffractive, Intermediate visual acuity, Multifocal, Trifocal
- 원문 및 링크아웃 정보 -
 
- 등재저널 정보 -
학술진흥재단(KCI) KoreaMed 대한의학회 회원