Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

´«¹°ÁÖ¸Ó´ÏÄھȿ¬°á¼ú Áß ½ÃÇàÇÑ Åë»óÀûÀÎ ´«¹°ÁÖ¸Ó´Ï Á¶Á÷»ý°ËÀÇ À¯¿ë¼º

The Clinical Utility of Routine Histological Biopsy during Dacryocystorhinostomy

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2020³â 61±Ç 11È£ p.1251 ~ 1256
¼ÒÇϸ², ±èÁöÇö, ±è¼ºÀº, ¾ç¼®¿ì,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼ÒÇϸ² ( So Ha-Rim ) - Catholic University College of Medicine Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Department of Ophthalmology
±èÁöÇö ( Kim Ji-Hyun ) - Catholic University College of Medicine Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Department of Ophthalmology
±è¼ºÀº ( Kim Sung-Eun ) - Catholic University College of Medicine Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Department of Ophthalmology
¾ç¼®¿ì ( Yang Suk-Woo ) - Catholic University College of Medicine Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Department of Ophthalmology

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ´«¹°±æÆó¼â ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ´«¹°ÁÖ¸Ó´ÏÄھȿ¬°á¼ú Áß ½ÃÇàÇÑ ´«¹°ÁÖ¸Ó´ÏÁ¶Á÷°Ë»ç¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ±× À¯¿ë¼ºÀ» È®ÀÎÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: 2009³â 4¿ùºÎÅÍ 2018³â 4¿ù±îÁö ´«¹°ÁÖ¸Ó´ÏÄھȿ¬°á¼ú ½Ã ´«¹°ÁÖ¸Ó´Ï Á¶Á÷¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¶Á÷º´¸®°Ë»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑ 1,266¸í(1,619¾È)À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ¼ö¼ú Àü ´«¹°ÁÖ¸Ó´ÏÀÇ ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾çÀÌ Áø´ÜµÈ »ç·Ê´Â Á¦¿ÜÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àǹ«±â·Ï ÈÄÇ⠺м®À» ÅëÇØ ¼ö¼úÀü ÀÓ»ó¾ç»ó, Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ºÐ·ù¿Í ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾ç ¿©ºÎ µîÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´°í ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾çÀ» Áø´Ü¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚÀÇ ³ªÀÌ, °ñ¼ö ħ¹ü ¿©ºÎ ¹× º´±â, ¿¹ÈÄ µîÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ³²ÀÚ 217¸í, ¿©ÀÚ 1,049¸í, Áø´Ü ´ç½Ã Æò±Õ ¿¬·ÉÀº 58.8 ¡¾ 12.3¼¼¿´´Ù. Á¶Á÷°Ë»ç °á°ú ¼¶À¯È­¸¦ µ¿¹ÝÇÑ ¸¸¼º ¿°Áõ(n=1,026 [81.0%])ÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í ¼¶À¯È­(n=133 [10.5%]), ¸¸¼º ¿°Áõ(n=94 [7.4%]), ¹ÝÀÀ¼º ¸²ÇÁ±¸ °úÁõ½Ä(n=5 [0.4%]), ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾ç(n=4 [0.3%]), °ü»ó¼±Á¾(n=2 [0.2%]), À¯µÎÁ¾(n=2 [0.2%])ÀÇ ºóµµ¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾çÀÇ °æ¿ì ¸ðµÎ Á¡¸· ¿¬°ü ¸²ÇÁÁ¶Á÷Çü ¸²ÇÁÁ¾À̾úÀ¸¸ç, ¼ö¼ú Àü 2¸íÀº ´«¹° È긲, 2¸íÀº ³»¾È°¢¿¡ ¸¸Á®Áö´Â Á¾±«°¡ ÀÖ¾ú°í Ãß°¡ ¿µ»ó°Ë»ç¿¡¼­ ¾Ç¼ºÀ» ½Ã»çÇÏ´Â ¼Ò°ßÀº ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ¿Ü ¼ö¼ú Àü °Ë»ç¿¡¼­ ÀÌ»ó ¼Ò°ßÀº º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ȯÀÚµéÀº Ç×¾Ï Ä¡·á ÈÄ ¿ÏÄ¡µÇ¾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: ´«¹°±æÆó¼â ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ÀÓ»óÁõ»ó, ÀÌÇÐÀû °Ë»ç, ¿µ»ó°Ë»ç ¹× ¼ö¼ú Áß À°¾È ¼Ò°ß¸¸À¸·Î ¾Ç¼º ¿©ºÎ¸¦ °¨º°ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø±â¿¡ ¼ö¼ú Áß ½ÃÇàÇÏ´Â Á¶Á÷°Ë»ç´Â ¿¹»óÇÏÁö ¸øÇÑ ¾Ç¼º Á¾¾çÀ» ¹ß°ßÇϰí Ä¡·áÇÏ´Â µ¥ ¸¹Àº µµ¿òÀ» ÁÙ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose: We assessed the clinical utility of routine histopathological evaluation of the lacrimal sac during dacryocystorhinostomy.

Methods: From April 2009 to April 2018, we included 1,619 eyes of 1,266 patients who underwent dacryocystorhinostomy in our hospital. All lacrimal sacs were histopathologically examined. We excluded cases in which malignant lacrimal sac tumors had been preoperatively diagnosed. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records in terms of clinical manifestations, histological findings after lacrimal sac biopsy, and malignant tumors. We recorded the age, extent of bone marrow involvement, stage, and prognosis of patients with malignancies.

Results: We treated 217 males and 1,049 females of a mean age at diagnosis of 58.8 ¡¾ 12.3 years. The biopsy data showed that chronic inflammation with fibrosis (n = 1,026 [81.0%]) was the most common condition, followed by fibrosis (n = 133 [10.5%]), chronic inflammation (n = 94 [7.4%]), reactive lymphoid hyperplasia (n = 5 [0.4%]), malignant tumors (n = 4 [0.3%]), tubular adenomas (n = 2 [0.2%]), and papillomas (n = 2 [0.2%]). All malignant tumors were mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas. Two of these four patients underwent additional imaging tests, but malignancies were not apparent. The other two had no specific complaints other than tearing. In addition, no abnormalities were evident on slit lamp examination or the syringing test. All four patients were cured by chemotherapy.

Conclusions: No clinical manifestation, physical examination or imaging data, or intraoperative finding in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstructions reliably identify a malignancy; but histological examination does.

Ű¿öµå

Biopsy; Dacryocystorhinostomy; Lacrimal sac

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸