잠시만 기다려 주세요. 로딩중입니다.

Usefulness of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 Level Compared to Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2020년 63권 6호 p.723 ~ 729
문하용, 고명진, 김용백, 박성원,
소속 상세정보
문하용 ( Mun Hah-Yong ) - Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Chung-Ang University Hospital Department of Neurosurgery
고명진 ( Ko Myeong-Jin ) - Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Chung-Ang University Hospital Department of Neurosurgery
김용백 ( Kim Young-Baeg ) - Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Chung-Ang University Hospital Department of Neurosurgery
박성원 ( Park Seung-Won ) - Chung-Ang University College of Medicine Chung-Ang University Hospital Department of Neurosurgery

Abstract


Objective: The use of oblique lateral interbody fusion at the L5-S1 level (OLIF51) is increasing, but no study has directly compared OLIF51 and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at the L5-S1 level. We evaluated the usefulness of OLIF51 by comparing clinical and radiologic outcomes with those of TLIF at the same L5-S1 level.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and compared 74 patients who underwent OLIF51 (OLIF51 group) and 74 who underwent TLIF at the L5-S1 level (TLIF51 group). Clinical outcomes were assessed with the visual analogue scale for back pain and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index. Mean disc height (MDH), foraminal height (FH), disc angle (DA), fusion rate, and subsidence rate were measured for radiologic outcomes.

Results: The OLIF51 group used significantly higher, wider, and larger-angled cages than the TLIF51 group (p<0.001). The postoperative MDH and FH were significantly greater in the OLIF51 group than in the TLIF51 group (p<0.001). The postoperative DA was significantly larger in the OLIF51 group than in the TLIF51 group by more than 10º (p<0.001). The fusion rate was 81.1% and 87.8% at postoperative 6 months in the OLIF51 and TLIF51 groups, respectively, and the TLIF51 group showed a higher fusion rate (p<0.05). The subsidence rate was 16.2% and 25.3% in the OLIF51 and TLIF51 groups, respectively, and the OLIF51 group showed a lower subsidence rate (p<0.05).

Conclusion: OLIF51 was more effective for the indirect decompression of foraminal stenosis, providing strong mechanical support with a larger cage, and making a greater lordotic angle with a high-angle cage than with TLIF.

키워드

Spinal fusion; Lumbar vertebrae, Instrumentation; Minimally invasive surgical procedures

원문 및 링크아웃 정보

 

등재저널 정보