잠시만 기다려 주세요. 로딩중입니다.

헤파린 부착 JO 스텐트와 미부착 JO 스텐트 삽입술 후의 장기 추적 성적 비교

Comparison of Long Term Follow-up Outcomes after Heparin-coated JO stent™and Un-coated JO stent™Implantation

계명의대논문집 2000년 19권 2호 p.193 ~ 204
남창욱, 김권배, 김기영, 김성열, 권택근, 이영수, 조봉기,
소속 상세정보
남창욱 (  ) - 계명대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
김권배 (  ) - 계명대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
김기영 (  ) - 계명대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
김성열 (  ) - 계명대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
권택근 (  ) - 계명대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
이영수 (  ) - 계명대학교 의과대학 내과학교실
조봉기 (  ) - 계명대학교 의과대학 내과학교실

Abstract


The risk of acute or subacute closure after angioplasty has been minimized by using stent deployment. However, restenosis rating 20% ∼30% after stenting is still most important limiting factor for stenting.
We investigated a long-term effect of implantation of a heparin-coated JO stent compared with the use of un-coated JO steno. Thirty eight patients were assigned heparin-coated JO stent{21 patients, JO(H)} or uncoated JO stent(17 patients, JO). All clinical and angiographic parameters were retrogradely reviewed. They were followed up monthly and performed follow-up coronary angiography 7 months later. The clinical and angiographic parameters were statistically not different between two groups, except hypertension {JO:18%, JO(H):52%, p<0.05}. The reference diameter was 3.12±0.53mm in 10 and 2.85 ±0.43mm in JO(H) (p=0.071). The minimum luminal diameter after stenting was not significantly different{2.91±0.52mm in JO, 2.78±0.42mm in JO(H), p=0.381}. The restenosis rate of JO was 32% and JO(H), 35%(p=0.545). Over seven months follow up, it seems that a strategy of elective stenting with heparin-coated JO stent was not more effective than uncoated JO stent.

키워드

원문 및 링크아웃 정보

등재저널 정보