ÀÇ·á±â°ü Á¾º°¿¡ µû¸¥ Àü»êÈ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µÀåºñ º¸À¯ÇöȲ°ú °Ë»ç·á°£ÀÇ °ü°è
Relationship Between Type of Medical Institutions According to the Equipment List and Inspection Fee Computed Tomography
±è¹Îö, ÀÓûȯ, ÁÖ¿µÃ¶,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¹Îö ( Kim Min-Cheol ) - ÇѼ´ëÇб³ ¹æ»ç¼±Çаú
ÀÓûȯ ( Lim Cheong-Hwan ) - ÇѼ´ëÇб³ ¹æ»ç¼±Çаú
ÁÖ¿µÃ¶ ( Joo Young-Cheol ) - »ï¼º¼¿ïº´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú
KMID : 0357520140370040315
Abstract
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â CT ÀåºñÀÇ ±¹³»¿¡¼ÀÇ º¸±Þ·ü°ú ÀÌ¿ë·üÀÌ Áõ°¡µÇ°í ÀÖ´Â È帧°ú Áõ°¡ÀÇ º¯È¿Í ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ º¯È°¡ °Ë»çºÎÀ§¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ºóµµ µîÀ» Á¤·®ÀûÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ÇöÀç ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ÀÇ·á±â°ü Á¾º° ¹× ½Ã±âº°ÀÇ ÀǷ῵»ó Áø´Ü ÀåºñÀÎ CTÀåÄ¡ÀÇ º¸À¯ÇöȲ, °Ë»ç·á µîÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÖ±Ù 10³â°£ÀÇ ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó ÀÇ·á±â°ü Á¾º°(»ó±ÞÁ¾ÇÕº´¿ø, Á¾ÇÕº´¿ø, º´¿ø, ÀÇ¿ø, Ä¡°úº´¿ø, º¸°ÇÀÇ·á¿ø, Çѹ溴¿ø) ¹× ¿¬µµº°(2003~2012)¿¡ µû¸¥ CTÀåÄ¡ º¸À¯ÇöȲ, ¿¬µµº° CT°Ë»ç·á¸¦ ÀÇ·á±â°ü Á¾º°ÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó CTÀåÄ¡´Â »ó±ÞÁ¾ÇÕº´¿ø°ú Á¾ÇÕº´¿ø±Þ ÀÇ·á±â°ü¿¡¼ º¸À¯ÇÑ ÃÑ ºñÀ²Àº 2003³â¿¡ 25.6%, 2011³â¿¡ 32.5%Á¤µµÀÎ ¹Ý¸é, º´¿ø°ú ÀÇ¿ø±Þ ÀÇ·á±â°ü¿¡¼ º¸À¯ÇÑ ºñÀ²Àº 2003³â¿¡ 73.5%¿Í 2009³â¿¡ 67.5%·Î ¾à 70%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇϰí ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2011³âµµ¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ »ó±ÞÁ¾ÇÕº´¿ø°ú Á¾ÇÕº´¿ø¿¡¼ ÃÑ °Ë»ç·áÀÇ 82.4% Á¤µµÀÎ ¹Ý¸é, º´¿ø°ú ÀÇ¿ø¿¡¼´Â ÃÑ °Ë»ç·áÀÇ 17.6%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. CTÀåºñ´Â º´¿ø±ÞÀº Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Â Ãß¼¼À̳ª ÀÇ¿ø±ÞÀº °¨¼ÒÇϰí ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. CT°Ë»ç·á ´ëºÎºÐÀº 80% ÀÌ»óÀÌ »ó±ÞÁ¾ÇÕº´¿ø°ú Á¾ÇÕº´¿ø¿¡¼ û±¸ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÇ·á±â°ü Á¾º° CTÀåºñ º¸À¯ÇöȲ°ú °Ë»ç·á°£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ À¯ÀǹÌÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ±× Áß¿¡¼µµ »ó±ÞÁ¾ÇÕº´¿øÀÇ CTº¸À¯´ë¼ö¿Í °Ë»ç·á°£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç(p<.001), CTº¸À¯´ë¼ö°¡ ¸¹¾ÆÁú¼ö·Ï °Ë»ç·á û±¸¾×µµ ³ô¾ÆÁø °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
This study demonstrates holding condition of CT by medical institution classification and by season, and examination fee in Korea currently to quantitatively understand frequency of examination region by change of CT equipment, domestic growing trend and change of distribution and using rate. Recent 10 years of CT holding condition by medical institution classification (Tertiary hospital, General hospital, Hospital, Clinic, Dental hospital, Dental clinic, Hospitalized health center) and by year (2003-2012), and CT examination fee of distribution of medical institution by year is surveyed. The holding ratio of Tertiary hospital level and General hospital level is 32.7% in 2003 and 33.0% in 2012. Whereas, Hospital and Clinic level is 74.2% in 2003 and 66.8% in 2012, which takes approximately 70%. Based on data in 2012, it is 82.2% of total examination fee in Tertiary hospital and General hospital, while 17.5% in hospital and clinic. CT holding rate of Hospital level is increasing, while Clinic level is decreasing. Approximately 80% of CT examination fee is claimed by Tertiary hospital and General hospital. Therefore, there is a significant correlation between CT holding condition of medical institution classification and examination fee. Particularly, correlation between CT holding number of Tertiary hospital and examination fee is significant (p<.001). The more CT holding number, the higher the amount claimed examination fee.
Ű¿öµå
Àü»êÈ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µÀåÄ¡; º´¿ø; CT°Ë»ç·á
Computed Tomogaphy; Hospital; CT Examination fee
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸