잠시만 기다려 주세요. 로딩중입니다.

Contrast Induced Nephropathy and 2-Year Outcomes of Iso-Osmolar Compared with Low-Osmolar Contrast Media after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Korean Circulation Journal 2021년 51권 2호 p.174 ~ 181
Du Mengyang, Jiang Lin, Tang Xiaofang, Gao Zhan, Xu Bo, Yuan Jinqing,
소속 상세정보
 ( Du Mengyang ) - Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Fuwai Hospital Department of Cardiology
 ( Jiang Lin ) - Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Fuwai Hospital Department of Cardiology
 ( Tang Xiaofang ) - Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Fuwai Hospital Department of Cardiology
 ( Gao Zhan ) - Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Fuwai Hospital Department of Cardiology
 ( Xu Bo ) - Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Fuwai Hospital Department of Cardiology
 ( Yuan Jinqing ) - Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Fuwai Hospital Department of Cardiology

Abstract


Background and Objectives: This study investigated the relative incidence of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) and long-term outcomes between iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) and low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM) undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: A total of 9,431 patients receiving elective PCI were enrolled in the cohort. The patients were divided into IOCM group and LOCM group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize the selection bias between groups.

Results: The multivariate analysis showed that the use of IOCM compared with LOCM did not affect the CIN incidence (odds ratio [OR], 0.912; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.576?1.446; p=0.696). After PSM, the incidence of CIN was 1.5% and 4.0% in IOCM group (n=979) and LOCM group (n=979), respectively, p=0.001. IOCM significantly reduced the incidence of CIN compared with LOCM (OR, 0.393; 95% CI, 0.214?0.722; p=0.003). After 2 years of follow-up, the all-cause mortality was higher in IOCM group than LOCM group (2.1% vs. 0.9%, p<0.001). Cox regression analysis showed IOCM was not independent risk factor of 2-years all-cause mortality (OR, 0.849; 95% CI, 0.510?1.412; p=0.528). After PSM, the difference of all-cause death between groups disappeared (1.7% vs. 1.9%, p=0.739). Cox regression analysis showed that the use of IOCM compared with LOCM did not affect the incidence of 2-year all-cause mortality (OR, 1.037; 95% CI, 0.534?2.014; p=0.915).

Conclusions: Compared with LOCM, IOCM significantly reduced the incidence of CIN after elective PCI, but had no significant effect on 2-year all-cause mortality.

키워드

Contrast media; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Coronary artery disease

원문 및 링크아웃 정보

 

등재저널 정보