잠시만 기다려 주세요. 로딩중입니다.

Comparing Inhaler Use Technique Based on Inhaler Type in Elderly Patients with Respiratory Disease

Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 2021년 84권 1호 p.46 ~ 54
이하연, 송진화, 원하경, 박연경, 정근범, 임효정, 안영미, 이병준,
소속 상세정보
이하연 ( Lee Ha-Youn ) - Serim General Hospital Department of Internal Medicine
송진화 ( Song Jin-Hwa ) - Veterans Health Service Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine
원하경 ( Won Ha-Kyeong ) - Veterans Health Service Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine
박연경 ( Park Yeon-Kyung ) - Veterans Health Service Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine
정근범 ( Chung Keun-Bum ) - Veterans Health Service Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine
임효정 ( Lim Hyo-Jeong ) - Veterans Health Service Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine
안영미 ( Ahn Young-Mee ) - Veterans Health Service Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine
이병준 ( Lee Byoung-Jun ) - Veterans Health Service Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine

Abstract


Background: The aim of this study was to investigate inhaler device handling in elderly patients. Inhaler devices with respect to misuse and error correction were also compared.

Methods: Inhaler use technique was assessed using standardized checklists at the first visit and 3-month follow-up visit after retraining. The primary outcome was difference in the acceptable use ratio among inhaler devices. Secondary outcomes included differences in error correction, the most common step of misuse, and factors affecting the accuracy of inhaler use.

Results: A total of 251 patients (mean age, 76.4 years) were included. The handling of 320 devices was assessed in the study. All patients had been trained before. However, only 24.7% of them used inhalers correctly. Proportions of acceptable use for Evohaler, Respimat, Turbuhaler, Ellipta, and Breezhaler/Handihaler were 38.7%, 50.0%, 61.4%, 60.8%, and 43.2%, respectively (p=0.026). At the second visit, the acceptable use ratio had increased. There were no significant differences among inhaler types (Evohaler, 63.9%; Respimat, 86.1%; Turbuhaler, 74.3%; Ellipta, 64.6%; and Breezhaler/Handihaler, 65.3% [p=0.129]). In multivariate analysis, body mass index, Turbuhaler, and Ellipta showed positive correlations with acceptable use of inhalers, whereas Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test score showed a negative correlation.

Conclusion: Although new inhalers have been developed, the accuracy of inhaler use remains low. Elderly patients showed more errors when using pressurized metered-dose inhalers than using dry powder inhalers and soft-mist inhalers. However, there were no significant differences in misuse among inhaler devices after individual training. Results of this study suggests that repeat training is more important than inhaler type.

키워드

Inhaler; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Asthma; Aged

원문 및 링크아웃 정보

등재저널 정보