잠시만 기다려 주세요. 로딩중입니다.

부산지역 치매 재활의 현황 분석

Analysis of the Current Status of Dementia Rehabilitation in Busan, South Korea

PNF and Movement 2020년 18권 2호 p.275 ~ 286
신재욱, 한혜경, 신상화, 박찬효, 김혜진, 김동인,
소속 상세정보
신재욱 ( Shin Jae-Wook ) - Busan Research Institute of Public Health and Service
한혜경 ( Han Hye-Kyung ) - Busan Research Institute of Public Health and Service
신상화 ( Shin Sang-Hwa ) - Busan Research Institute of Public Health and Service
박찬효 ( Park Chan-Hyo ) - Busan Research Institute of Public Health and Service
김혜진 ( Kim Hye-Jin ) - Busan Research Institute of Public Health and Service
김동인 ( Kim Dong-In ) - Busan Research Institute of Public Health and Service

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study is to understand and analyze the current status of dementia management and rehabilitation services in Busan, South Korea, in response to the rapid increase of people with dementia due to the aging of the population.

Methods: To investigate the current status of dementia rehabilitation in Busan, a survey was disseminated to dementia safety centers and day- and night-care centers in 16 districts/counties in Busan. Of the 209 day- and night-care centers, 23 institutes were registered in the National Health Insurance Service and received the highest grade (Grade A) in the institute evaluation that was implemented in each district. A telephone interview was conducted, and survey questions were related to the existence of an ongoing dementia rehabilitation program, program presenter, number of participants, progress method, program time, program duration, program contents, and participation path.

Results: Dementia safety centers were implementing dementia prevention program, cognitive enhancing program, dementia program, self-help meeting and education program for family of dementia patient. The majority of the presenters of all four dementia-related programs were occupational therapists. The highest number of participants in the dementia prevention program was 15, and the highest number of participants in the cognitive enhancing program, dementia program, self-help meeting and education program for family of dementia patient was 10. All institutes’ programs delivered group therapy. As for the time and frequency of the program, most dementia program included three-hour sessions five times a week. Most dementia prevention program, cognitive enhancing program, self-help meeting and education program for family of dementia patient included 60-minute sessions once a week. The most frequently observed program duration for the dementia prevention program and cognitive enhancing program was six months, and the most frequently observed duration for the dementia program was three months. Lastly, study participants most often reported that self-help meeting and education program for family of dementia patient lasted for two months. Among day- and night-care centers in Busan, programs related to cognition were implemented in 18 institutes, and the majority of the program presenters were social workers.

Conclusion: In response to the rapidly growing number of dementia patients due to the aging of the population, this study examined the current status of dementia rehabilitation in Busan. The study results underscore the need to develop systems that consider the circumstances in Busan and continuously and systematically support dementia programs.

키워드

Dementia; Dementia management; Dementia rehabilitation service

원문 및 링크아웃 정보

등재저널 정보